0
Skip to Content
CylentisAI
Home
CylentisAI
Home
Home
Cylentis. Book a Demo
Governed Intelligence for R&D Portfolios

Stop assembling reports.
Start answering questions.

Your research portfolio already has the answers. They're buried in SharePoint, Salesforce, and a dozen systems that don't talk to each other. We make them findable, defensible, and honest.

Book a 20-Minute Demo See the Problem We Solve
Cylentis.Governance Hub
🏠 Today
📊 Portfolio
📄 Case Studies
📋 Board Packs
✨ Ask
🔍 Intelligence
Deep Dive
📈 Weekly Brief
🛡 Evidence Posture
Runtime Health
Inference Engine
Hybrid Search
Response Cache
Data Connector
🏠 Needs Attention Now
What matters right now across your portfolio.

⚠ 4 RED projects need rescue-or-exit decisions

The active portfolio has 4 projects flagged RED, with limited runway remaining. Each needs a clear decision: commit to a demonstrator pathway or prepare to close.

What to do: Run a 30-day rescue triage covering final output, partner commitment, and cost-to-complete.
CRITICAL

⚡ GREEN projects with hidden translation risk

Several GREEN projects carry unresolved Finance, Partnership, or IP flags. Likely to finish technically but may still miss adoption.

HIGH
⚠ Risk Snapshot
4
High
8
Medium
0
Low
🛡 Review Evidence Posture

See which claims need qualification before external reporting.

📊 Portfolio
Health, risks & early warnings · 48 active projects
ProjectOverallFinanceResearchPartner
Advanced materials for sustainable infrastructure
◷ StaleDQ 72%
Eco-friendly composite using industrial by-products
DQ 76%
Recarbonation modelling for structural elements
◷ StaleDQ 72%
Waste mineral conversion to carbon-absorbing materials
DQ 71%
Advanced materials for sustainable infrastructure
PRJ-0188
GREEN
Owner: Research Lead · Updated: 20 Jan 2026
Freshness: Needs refresh
Finance
Research
Partnership
IP
Overview
Progress 1
Deliverables 4
Risks 3
✨ Signal Watch WATCH
Research capability build is advancing, but delivery pressure is now visible. Execution discipline matters more than the initial contracting win.
materials validationcommercialization
Project Read
This project has a credible setup story, but the current picture is shaped by one overdue deliverable and three open risks.
Executive Read
Execution discipline now matters more than the initial contracting win. For a project positioned across materials validation and commercialization, the gap between procured capability and completed deliverables is the key watchpoint.
Operating Read
Operationally, the clearest movement is in procurement — enabling infrastructure for the research agenda is the key watchpoint.
✨ Ask Anything
Natural language queries · Governed evidence base
What are the main risks across the portfolio?
▶ Ask
◉ DIRECTIONAL20 source records · 43 evidence items · 20 projectsStake: standard · GCA-v1

Main risks across the portfolio

Based on the authoritative governance records, portfolio risks cluster into five recurring themes: partner instability or disengagement 14, delivery delays 9, commercialisation risk 21, and budget timing 24. The evidence suggests the biggest shared risk is projects losing momentum because industry partners are unavailable or disengaged. 35

⚡ Strategic Signals
Cross-portfolio intelligence · Auto-detected patterns
Signals
16
High Priority
16
Avg Confidence
70%
Families
3
PROJECTRISK EXPOSEDHIGH CONFIDENCE

Upstream risk exposure detected across linked projects.

One project is currently exposed through upstream links to four red-flagged projects. Portfolio overlay detected cross-contamination of delivery risk.

100%
Signal
100%
Urgency
88%
Confidence
🛡 Evidence Posture
What your portfolio can defend — and what to ask the team next.
✨ 7 portfolio questions currently need qualification before board, funder, or external reporting.
Need Qualification
7
Before external reporting
Projects to Follow Up
48
Evidence follow-up needed
Fixable This Week
130
Resolvable now
Closed This Cycle
0
Already closed out
AI Executive Lens

A full scan found 130 evidence gaps across 48 projects. Main pressure: portfolio freshness, document promotion, and evidence depth. All gaps are current and addressable.

Board-facing questions still need qualification
Freshness issues may distort current status
Evidence depth is thin in multiple projects

Stop assembling reports.
Start answering questions.

Your portfolio already has the answers. We make them findable, defensible, and honest.
Book a 20-Minute Demo
10 wks
Reclaimed / year
45 sec
Question answered
100%
Evidence-backed
Live
Since 2025
cylentis.com

What needs attention right now. Flagged before the board sees it.

Every project. Every dimension. Signal Watch and three governance reads on every entity.

Any question. 45 seconds. Every claim cited. Confidence scored. GCA-v1.

16 signals auto-detected. Ranked by urgency. Evidence-backed.

130 evidence gaps. Ranked by impact. What you can't defend — yet.

10 wks

Reclaimed per year

45 sec

Portfolio question answered

100%

Evidence-backed or flagged

Live

CRC deployed since 2025

Sound Familiar?

Great science. No way to see it clearly.

These are the problems we hear from every portfolio leader we talk to.

“

I spend two and a half weeks every quarter pulling together board packs from five different systems.

“

The Commonwealth asks a question and I have to call three people and wait a week before I can answer.

“

We've got $21 million in funded research and I can't tell you where to put the next $500K.

“

I don't know which of our 40 projects are on track. I don't even know how many technology buckets we have.

“

Someone on the board asked about our translation pipeline and I had to wing it.

“

We tried Copilot. It made things up. We can't put hallucinated numbers in a Commonwealth report.

What Changes

From weeks of assembly to seconds of answers.

Same data. Same systems. Completely different capability.

Before Cylentis
2.5 weeks per quarter assembling board packs manually
Can't answer board questions without calling multiple people
No view across technologies, partners, or project status
Copilot and ChatGPT hallucinate in governance contexts
Spreadsheets and slide decks as the system of record
→
After Cylentis
Board packs generated in minutes with full evidence chains
Any portfolio question answered in 45 seconds with citations
Complete view of every project, technology, and partner
System tells you when it doesn't have enough evidence
One governed evidence base underneath your existing tools
The Difference

If the evidence isn't there, we say so.

Every AI tool tells you what it found. We're the only one that formally tells you what it can't answer — and exactly what data would change that. That's not a limitation. That's governance.

query › What is the commercialisation readiness of Project SC-027?
⚠ PARTIAL ABSTENTION
Partner engagement and field trial evidence support moderate readiness (3 sources, directional confidence).
However, no IP protection filings or market validation data were found in the corpus.
→ Adding IP status and market analysis would upgrade this from Directional to Verified.
Sources: Progress Report Q3 2025, Partner Engagement Log, Field Trial Summary Newcastle
In Production

Not a prototype. Not a pitch deck.

Deployed and running with a live CRC since September 2025.

48Projects governed
93Partners tracked
29Technologies mapped
503People indexed

Data ingested daily from SharePoint and Salesforce. Board packs, signal watches, technology readiness, case studies, and portfolio queries — all from one governed evidence base.

Board packs: 2.5 weeks → minutes  ·  Portfolio queries: days → 45 seconds  ·  Hallucinations: zero
See It In Action

What portfolio leaders actually see.

Live governance surfaces from a deployed R&D portfolio. Real structure. Real intelligence. Real evidence chains.

C.
🏠 Today
📊 Portfolio
📄 Cases
📋 Packs
✨ Ask
🔍 Intel
📈 Brief
🛡 Evidence
🏠 Needs attention now
What matters right now across your portfolio.
⚠ 4 RED projects need rescue-or-exit decisions

15 months left before wind-up. Each needs a clear decision: commit to a demonstrator pathway or prepare to close.

What to do: Run a 30-day rescue triage covering final output, partner commitment, and cost-to-complete.
CRITICAL
⚡ GREEN projects with hidden translation risk

Several GREEN projects carry unresolved Finance, Partnership, or IP flags. Likely to finish technically but may still miss adoption.

HIGH
The CEO opens this Monday morning. Every risk flagged before it reaches the board.
C.
🏠 Today
📊 Portfolio
📄 Cases
📋 Packs
✨ Ask
🔍 Intel
📈 Brief
🛡 Evidence
📊 Portfolio health
48 active projects · Signal Watch on every entity
Green
41
Amber
6
Red
1
Total
48
✨ Signal Watch WATCH
Research capability is advancing, but delivery pressure is now visible.
Project read
Credible setup but shaped by one overdue deliverable and three open risks.
Executive read
Execution discipline now matters more than the initial contracting win.
Operating read
Clearest movement is procurement — enabling infrastructure is the key watchpoint.
Every project scored. Signal Watch and three governance reads on every entity.
C.
🏠 Today
📊 Portfolio
📄 Cases
📋 Packs
✨ Ask
🔍 Intel
📈 Brief
🛡 Evidence
✨ Ask anything
Natural language queries · governed evidence base
What are the main risks across the portfolio?
▶ Ask
◉ DIRECTIONAL20 records · 43 evidence items · GCA-v1
Main risks across the portfolio

Portfolio risks cluster into five themes: partner instability 14, delivery delays 9, commercialisation risk 21, budget timing 24, and research execution risk 27. The biggest shared risk is projects losing momentum because industry partners are disengaged. 35

Any question. 45 seconds. Every claim cited. Confidence scored.
C.
🏠 Today
📊 Portfolio
📄 Cases
📋 Packs
✨ Ask
🔍 Intel
📈 Brief
🛡 Evidence
🛡 Evidence posture
What you can and cannot defend this week.
✨ 7 portfolio questions need qualification before board or funder reporting.
Need qualification
7
Follow up
48
Fixable now
130
Closed
0
AI executive lens

130 evidence gaps across 48 projects. Main pressure: portfolio freshness, document promotion, and evidence depth.

Board-facing questions need qualification
Freshness issues may distort status
Evidence depth thin in multiple projects
130 evidence gaps ranked by impact. What your portfolio can't defend — yet.
Built For

If you govern a research portfolio, this is for you.

We work with organisations that manage funded research and need to defend their answers.

CRC Leaders

You report to the Commonwealth, manage dozens of projects across multiple partners, and spend weeks every quarter on reporting that should take minutes.

University Research Leadership

You oversee hundreds of research streams and can't get a clear picture of where the strongest translation opportunities are without asking 10 people.

Research Portfolio Directors

You need to know which projects are on track, which technologies are progressing, and where the next funding tranche should go — backed by evidence, not instinct.

How It Works

Six weeks to set up. Zero disruption.

Your data stays where it is. We structure it underneath. No new tools for your team to learn.

Week 1–2

Connect

We plug into your SharePoint, Salesforce, or wherever your data lives. Nothing moves. Nothing changes for your team.

Week 3–4

Structure

We build your governed evidence base — every project, partner, technology, and milestone mapped with provenance and confidence.

Week 5–6

Deliver

Your portfolio is live. Board packs in minutes. Any question answered. Gaps flagged. Intelligence your board can actually defend.

Ongoing

Compound

Every question asked makes the system smarter. Every quarter, we deliver new intelligence surfaces based on what your organisation actually needs.

Cylentis does not replace researchers.

Researchers create the science. Partners drive deployment. Commonwealth funding enables impact. Cylentis is the layer that makes the evidence visible, governable, and actionable — so the people making decisions can actually defend them.

SmartCrete CRC

“Cylentis took the time to deeply understand our requirements along with the environment and systems that we operate within, and translated that into an AI-enabled interrogation tool that allows us to efficiently analyse large volumes of qualitative project data. The quality of the solution has exceeded our expectations, delivering clear, actionable insights that are already strengthening how we monitor and manage our portfolio.”

Clare Tubolets  ·  CEO, SmartCrete CRC

Who Built This
Aaron Bost

Aaron Bost

Founder, Cylentis AI

I built Cylentis because I watched a CRC CEO spend two and a half weeks every quarter pulling together board packs from five different systems. The research was excellent. The governance infrastructure wasn't. So I built the governed evidence layer that sits underneath — connecting SharePoint, Salesforce, and everything else into one source of truth. Every answer is cited. Every gap is flagged. If the system doesn't have the evidence, it says so. Based in Sydney. One product. One problem. Doing it properly.

See Cylentis Live

Collaborate Innovate 2026  ·  Perth  ·  May 2026

Book a 20-minute demo at the conference. Bring a question about your portfolio.

Book at Conference

Your portfolio already has the answers.

Book a 20-minute demo. Bring a question about your portfolio. We'll answer it live — or show you exactly why we can't.

Book a Demo Start a Conversation

© 2026 Cylentis AI — Sydney, Australia  ·  aaron@cylentis.com